As the regulatory noose tightens around CZ and Binance, coins of decentralized exchanges such as GMX outperforms BNB
Like, retweet and read on for some alpha
🦦🧵👇🏻
Centralized exchanges (CEXs) require a central authority to manage user accounts, deposits, and withdrawals. This makes them vulnerable to government oversight and regulation
In contrast, DEXs operate on decentralized networks and are not controlled by any single entity. This makes them more resistant to government intervention.
Because DEXs are not centralized, they cannot be shut down or seized by government authorities. This means that they are less vulnerable to regulatory blowback.
DEXs use smart contracts to execute trades, which means that transactions are transparent and immutable. This makes it difficult for regulators to track and monitor activity on the platform.
DEXs do not require users to provide personal information or undergo KYC/AML checks. This makes it more difficult for regulators to identify and track individual users.
Unlike CEXs, DEXs do not hold users' funds in custody. This means that users have full control over their own assets and are not at risk of losing them if the platform is shut down.
Because DEXs are open source, anyone can participate in the network and contribute to its development. This makes it more difficult for governments to regulate or control the platform.
DEXs operate on a peer-to-peer basis, which means that trades are executed directly between users. This eliminates the need for a central authority to manage trades, reducing the platform's vulnerability to regulations. Peer to peer is exactly how Satoshi envisioned Bitcoin!
DEXs operate on a global scale, which means that they are not subject to the jurisdiction of any single government or regulatory body. This makes it more difficult for regulators to enforce their rules on the platform.
Because DEXs do not rely on a central authority to manage trades, they can operate 24/7 without interruption. This makes them more accessible and convenient for users around the world.
Because DEXs are decentralized, they are not subject to the same operational risks as CEXs. This means that they are less likely to experience hacks, outages, or other technical issues.
Because DEXs are community-driven, they tend to have more transparent and democratic decision-making processes. This reduces the risk of corruption or abuse of power within the platform.
DEXs are still in their early stages of development, which means that there is still plenty of room for innovation and improvement. This makes them an exciting and dynamic space to be in.
By embracing DEXs, we can create a more open and decentralized financial system that empowers individuals and communities around the world.
In conclusion, DEXs are more protected against regulatory blowback than CEXs because they are decentralized, transparent, and community-driven. As the crypto ecosystem continues to evolve, DEXs are poised to play an increasingly important role in shaping the future of France